Does Fashion Photography Have a Future in the Age of AI?
26 • 03 • 22Liliom Szabó
Fashion photography has never been free from criticism. The beauty standards of a given moment change from year to year: bold becomes even bolder, then suddenly restrained and angelic. Yet despite constantly changing trends, the relationship between muses and photographers has long formed a productive creative symbiosis. However, artificial intelligence now disrupts this long-established balance, fundamentally altering the future of fashion photography. So, what does the future hold for this particular branch of photography? [1]
In recent years the fashion system has begun to move toward greater inclusivity, and photographers have started to recognize the creative potential in diverse body types, personalities, and physical features once dismissed as flaws—such as vitiligo. [2] Artificial intelligence, however, generates models that are increasingly detached from physical reality and fail to meet the standards of this more creative photographic direction. In the field of fashion photography, close collaborations between models and photographers have produced iconic images that have shaped fashion’s visual culture for decades and defined subsequent trends. [3] These collaborations not only captured the essence of a brand but also helped redefine beauty standards. In such relationships, the model functions not merely as a decorative element but also as the photographer’s confidant and driving force of creativity: a smile or a particular facial expression can bring out the best in the artist and help reveal their authentic visual language. [4]
A Fruitful Symbiosis
A striking example of this type of creative connection is the British model Twiggy, who became an international sensation in the 1960s. [5] Her success was closely linked to the work of photographer Barry Lategan. Lategan’s airy, minimalist portraits captured Twiggy’s iconic doe-eyed gaze and boyish charm, shaping the visual aesthetic of the “Swinging Sixties.” This artistic partnership not only launched Twiggy’s supermodel career but also opened the way for a more natural, androgynous beauty standard embraced by an entire generation. [6]
Another essential example is the collaboration between supermodel Naomi Campbell and photographer Steven Meisel, whose partnership produced some of the most iconic images in the history of fashion photography. [7] Meisel’s provocative, avant-garde vision, combined with Campbell’s powerful presence, appeared on countless magazine covers and campaigns. Together, they repeatedly pushed the boundaries of beauty and representation. Similarly, the photographs created through the collaboration of Cindy Crawford and Herb Ritts remain among the most iconic fashion images of the 1980s and 1990s. [8] Ritts’s powerful black-and-white portraits—often emphasizing Crawford’s distinctive beauty mark—embodied an aesthetic of natural elegance and timeless beauty.
These examples demonstrate that beyond its glamorous surface, fashion photography is in fact a genre that demands deep creative labor. As Peter Lindbergh, one of the most influential figures in fashion photography, has explained, fashion photography is fundamentally a form of fiction that emerges from imagined ideas gradually assembled through casting, location, and collaboration. [9] This perspective focuses primarily on the relationship between the photographer and the model, yet it does not fully account for the immense creative energy contributed by fashion designers, stylists, and professional makeup artists to each project. Artificial intelligence can only replace the work of so many creative minds through imitation that lacks genuine originality.
The Debate Around AI and Creative Labor
At the end of January 2026, the UK Association of Photographers (AOP), together with the Independent Society of Musicians, the Society of Authors, the Equity union, and the Association of Illustrators, published a report calling for legislative action to protect the creative industries in the age of artificial intelligence. The report brings together data from several creative sectors, including the AOP’s most recent survey on copyright and AI, as well as questionnaire-based research drawing on responses from more than 10,000 creators.[10]
The outrage expressed by creative professionals—including fashion photographers—is further supported by a joint report from PetaPixel and Kapwing, which examined the 200 photographers whose styles are most frequently requested by users on Midjourney, a popular AI image-generation platform. [11] According to the study, world-renowned photographer Annie Leibovitz ranks first, with more than 46,000 prompts explicitly referring to her name and style. This does not mean that a photographer’s work has been replaced that many times—many requests come from casual users—but it highlights a significant issue: both small and large companies can easily appropriate the stylistic signatures of famous photographers and use them in advertising campaigns. Such practices have sparked serious debates within fashion photography, particularly concerning copyright, artistic identity, and the appropriation of style.
0103
Recently, photographers have also discovered the potential inherent in different body types, personalities, and features that are often dismissed as flaws at first glance—such as vitiligo. Artificial intelligence, however, generates models that are far removed from reality and fail to meet the standards of this creative photographic movement.
The Future of AI Model Agencies: A Threat to Fashion Photography
Producing high-quality fashion imagery requires time, energy, and above all, creative professionals. The travel, food, and logistics behind a photoshoot can “easily” be replaced by AI-generated models, which do not have working hours. Some agencies already generate digital avatars that can be licensed for fashion campaigns, while in other cases, brands have sought to digitize models with whom they already collaborate—using their faces to produce future campaigns without their physical presence.
From luxury brands to fast-fashion companies, many are working to replace traditional creative processes with AI-generated models. According to Precedence Research, the AI-driven fashion market could reach 60 billion dollars by 2034, with an annual growth rate approaching 40 percent. [12]
This trend, perhaps needless to mention, inevitably threatens the position of fashion photographers as well. However, consumers may also experience the consequences of this shift: whereas advertisements previously featured real people—albeit heavily retouched—this new setup increasingly presents artificially generated models that only vaguely resemble real human beings, smiling back from displays.
The current generation still includes photographers such as Tyler Mitchell and Chloe Horseman, whose visual language and artistic character are irreplaceable. Yet what will happen to future generations of photographers—and what impact this transformation will ultimately have on the fashion industry itself—remains uncertain. It may ultimately be that the golden age of fashion photography will remain the 1990s.
- Joanne Entwistle, The Fashioned Body: Fashion, Dress and Social Theory. Polity Press, 2015.
- Ashley Mears, Pricing Beauty: The Making of a Fashion Model. University of California Press, 2011.
- Christopher Breward, Fashion. Oxford University Press, 2003.
- Yuniya Kawamura, Fashion-ology: An Introduction to Fashion Studies. Berg, 2005.
- Carlyn Wilcox, Twiggy: A Life in Pictures. Rizzoli, 2015.
- Barry Lategan, Barry Lategan: Photographs. Thames & Hudson, 2010.
- Steven Meisel, Steven Meisel: Photographs. Rizzoli, 2006.
- Herb Ritts and Cindy Crawford, Herb Ritts: Work. Rizzoli, 1999.
- Peter Lindbergh, “Interview on Fashion Photography.” Dazed, 2016.
- Association of Photographers et al. Brave New World? Justice for Creators in the Age of Generative AI. London, 2026.
- PetaPixel and Kapwing, AI Style Replication Report. 2025, https://petapixel.com.
- Precedence Research, AI in Fashion Market Forecast 2025–2034. Precedence Research, 2025.